Proposals & Suggestions for Rule Changes http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/forums/9 en-us Copyright 2006, Yuku feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster) webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster) Fri, 06 Nov 2009 07:55:36 GMT Yuku Feeds 1.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Yuku http://static.yuku.com//feed/bypass/images/button-yuku.png http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/forums/9 Yuku - free hosted forums and profiles 88 31 {pics-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 )) Search Search Domain q http://yuku.com/search/direct/ <![CDATA[ DAAK rule change to AAR bid system ]]> http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/4400/t/DAAK-rule-change-to-AAR-bid-system.html This rule change will be written into their ruleset. Is there any discussion of adopting the new ruleset or bidding system for IAAPA? ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Molvas) http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/4400 Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:13:57 GMT <![CDATA[ Forgotten Battle ]]> http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/882/t/Forgotten-Battle.html
1. Errors are correctable only within a time period of 1 subsequent turn; if they are not identified and corrected within that time, they become fixed. For example, if an error occurs on Russia 1, but is not recognized until after G1 has been rolled, it is not subject to correction.

For some forgotten battles the results of applying this rule are obvious, others not so. For examples, let's consider the... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (GenKomp) http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/882 Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:22:44 GMT <![CDATA[ how can we get rid of techs? ]]> http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/883/t/how-can-we-get-rid-of-techs-.html
Anyway, if somebody has a good idea to persuade the "generals" to prove their skills... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Gio the Lion) http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/883 Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:38:24 GMT <![CDATA[ Drawn Games ]]> http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/884/t/Drawn-Games.html
There are times when both players may find it in their best interest to allow a draw. For example, a real life issue may come up on a recently started game, and neither player wants to kep an "open" game on the books. In other instances, both players may decide that the board... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (BlackWatch) http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/884 Fri, 20 Jul 2007 08:23:58 GMT <![CDATA[ new retreat rule... ]]> http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/887/t/new-retreat-rule-.html feeds@yuku.com (mav40121) http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/887 Sat, 09 Dec 2006 15:18:00 GMT <![CDATA[ Just a rules question ]]> http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/888/t/Just-a-rules-question.html
At any rate, sending errors
Quote:
h. If a battle is invalidated due to a sender error and the player chooses not to fight the battle with the correct number of units then those units initially assigned to fight may not move during non-combat.


Say I send 2Inf, 1Arm vs 2Inf and win w/1Inf, 1Arm but my opponent says "hold... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Starchild88) http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/888 Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:11:41 GMT <![CDATA[ This rule has to go!! ]]> http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/889/t/This-rule-has-to-go-.html
It's quite plainly a silly rule and doesn't belong in IAAPA.

My opponent attacked Australia with the Allies going to GAB SZ from Peru SZ.

I put it on my board as COR SZ instead so on my subsequent Japanese turn I attack it with 1Sub/ 2Ftr from Bur moving pieces to WAu SZ (including an AC so the Ftr's could land) but since there actually is no Trn in Cor SZ my opponent cries sending error and says my Sub... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Starchild88) http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/889 Sun, 22 Oct 2006 08:02:37 GMT <![CDATA[ Magic 100? ]]> http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/886/t/Magic-100-.html
Can we have a magic 100, or 105, or something like it for the allies. It's not much fun to know the game is won but also know (haven't seen it happen yet but I'm sure it does) that you must capture Japan? ]]> feeds@yuku.com (selfparody) http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/886 Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:59:52 GMT <![CDATA[ Rolling for incorrect units... ]]> http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/890/t/Rolling-for-incorrect-units-.html
As such, I would propose that IAAPA amend its rolling error rules (for ALL rule sets) to require that the actual correct unit must be rolled for each time, or a rolling error has occurred. Currently, if an incorrect unit rolls at the same value as a correct unit, its... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (BlackWatch) http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/890 Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:32:28 GMT <![CDATA[ Variant ]]> http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/892/t/Variant.html
I'm working on a Variant section of IAAPA and would like to develop an "Almost Axis & Allies" variant which uses many of the suggestions from this BBS.

A thread has started at:
p075.ezboard.com/fiaapaop...D=63.topic feeds@yuku.com (airship) http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/892 Thu, 03 Jun 2004 22:34:26 GMT <![CDATA[ Double or Nothing Magic 84 Option? ]]> http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/885/t/Double-or-Nothing-Magic-84-Option-.html
Let's take an example: Axis wins due to Magic 84. Allied player can simply accept this fact OR ELSE HE CAN CHOOSE TO CHALLENGE the M84 victory and require the Axis to play on until (A) the Axis player convinces... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Einstein43) http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/885 Thu, 13 May 2004 13:56:14 GMT <![CDATA[ Change PBEM Error Correction Rules ]]> http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/893/t/Change-PBEM-Error-Correction-Rules.html
See gesserit.net/PBEM_ERROR_CORRECTION.html for the proposed revision.

Note that the revision is entirely in the formatting of the rules, to ensure that they are easy to read and understand.
]]> feeds@yuku.com (CatChris) http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/893 Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:35:01 GMT <![CDATA[ I propose that the IAAPA supports 4ed, or changes its name. ]]> http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/894/t/I-propose-that-the-IAAPA-supports-4ed-or-changes-its-name-.html
I for one am not a fan of rules changes, as you may have noticed in other threads. :)

But if we don't support the game "Axis and Allies" that people who walk into the store and as for "Axis and Allies" will get, then we should at least change our club name.

Some new... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (w0nderd0g) http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/894 Wed, 10 Mar 2004 22:30:00 GMT <![CDATA[ Redefining Cheetahs, Wolves and Hounds... ]]> http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/891/t/Redefining-Cheetahs-Wolves-and-Hounds-.html
Let me know what you think of the following proposal...

********************

Time Limits for turns - 3 tier system

Notification of absence would still provide you the exemption from completing a turn within these time limits (as it does now for regular games).

Tier 1. Hounds. Each turn can take up to 10 days. If your opponent has... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (BlackWatch) http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/891 Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:54:45 GMT <![CDATA[ Lifting the lid on a Pandora's Box....... ]]> http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/896/t/Lifting-the-lid-on-a-Pandora-s-Box-.html
Will it be another variant or the default gameplay?

Your thoughts....

PipPopsRising11 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (PipPopsRising11) http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/896 Sat, 07 Feb 2004 19:57:37 GMT <![CDATA[ BB casualties ]]> http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/895/t/BB-casualties.html
Units hit by BB bombardment do not get to fire back.

Eric ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Raist88) http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/895 Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:52:24 GMT <![CDATA[ results of unofficial poll ]]> http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/897/t/results-of-unofficial-poll.html From the pool of 197 members polled, there have been 59 respondents.
        This is barely the suggested thirty percent required for validity. Hence, the significance of the results is tenuous at best.

Of the 59 respondents 15 (25.4%) expressed an opposition to rules changes of any kind.

Of the 59 respondents from 21 - 26 (35.6 44.0 %) expressed opposition to changing one or more of the four rules... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (ShenFung) http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/897 Fri, 31 Oct 2003 14:28:35 GMT <![CDATA[ Commentary: ad hoc IAAPA poll ]]> http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/898/t/Commentary-ad-hoc-IAAPA-poll.html         I have not read any threads since Monday, 10/27. If it seems that I have not considered ideas that may have been posted since that time, this is the reason.
        The following are some responses to ideas expressed directly through the poll venue. I address these first only because they are the focus of my attention at this time.

       
     ... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (ShenFung) http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/898 Fri, 31 Oct 2003 10:18:47 GMT <![CDATA[ Poll Work Done ]]> http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/899/t/Poll-Work-Done.html
As you are now likely aware, per the advice of BW, I have sent the poll to all members.

I have recieved admonishmnets from at least one for "exposing" the addresses. This "danger" did not occur to me and it was not amongst the outlined instructions.
Nevertheless, my apologies for this unintentional oversight.

Thank you in advance for your participation and support in sharing a voice in making this a top-rate organization.

yours in... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (ShenFung) http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/899 Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:19:00 GMT <![CDATA[ Boromir ]]> http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/900/t/Boromir.html
"ah well.. another bad rule... should be that you retreat to where you came from.. explaining the ability to traverse hostile territory and exit the other side is about as logical as certain other rules we use and stand by in the face of all logic to the contrary. (disclaimer: personal opinion only)"

Ah, Ah, Ah! Rest easy. I'm not gonna even "go there"

But your comments (disclaimed or not) [almost] makes it all worth... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (ShenFung) http://iaapaopenforumbbs.yuku.com/topic/900 Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:37:05 GMT